SITE_ASSESSMENTS · 441_UNIT_MOAT_FRAMEWORK · B2B_SYSTEMS

1,676 properties screened.
1 acquired.
That is the methodology.

The 441-unit MOAT framework is cited on every page of this platform. This is where it is explained. Six pillars. 441 analytical units. Applied before a single dollar of capital is committed.

UNITS

441

Analytical Units

SCREENED

1,676

Properties Scored

FLAGSHIP

95/100

SS069 MOAT Score

LOSS_RATE

0%

Capital Lost

MOAT_FRAMEWORK · SIX_PILLARS · 441_UNITS

Analytical Framework Summary

POWER

Power Infrastructure

35 pts

FIBER

Fiber & Connectivity

30 pts

BUILDING

Building Quality

40 pts

REGULATORY

Regulatory & Zoning

25 pts

FINANCIAL

Financial Profile

35 pts

RISK

Risk Architecture

35 pts

200_PILLAR_PTS · 241_VERIFIED_MOAT_UNITS · /100_NORMALIZED

COST_OF_BAD_SITE_SELECTION · WHY_THE_FRAMEWORK_EXISTS

The methodology exists because the cost of a wrong answer is not a missed opportunity. It is a capital loss.

Every scenario below is a real failure mode in commercial real estate site selection. Every one is preventable with pre-LOI verification. Every one happens without it.

FAILURE_SCENARIO

FINANCIAL_LOSS

TIMING

Wrong site acquired, DC conversion fails

$1.2M – $4.8M

12–24 months to realize

Carrier lease negotiated without data

30–60% below market for 25+ years

Permanent structural loss

Property purchased in oversaturated MSA

Exit at 40–60 cents on dollar

Discovered at refinance

Environmental flag found post-LOI

$400K – $1.1M sunk cost abandoned

After 4–8 months of effort

Zoning conflict discovered at permit stage

$200K – $600K + 18-month delay

After engineering commitment

The 441-unit framework was built to eliminate every row above before capital is committed. Pre-LOI. Not post-discovery.

FRAMEWORK_ARCHITECTURE · SIX_PILLARS · EXPAND_TO_EXPLORE

Six pillars. 441 analytical units. Nothing guessed.

Select any pillar below to see the specific analytical units within it, the data sources used to verify each unit, and why that pillar is weighted the way it is.

ANALYTICAL_UNITS (7)

Utility rate (RTMP vs. spot market)

CIAC estimate and timeline

Grid stability index

Feeder capacity and N-1 redundancy

Substation distance and headroom

Expansion path to 10+ MW

Reserve margin verification

DATA_SOURCES

Utility tariff filings, GIS substation mapping, NERC reliability data

WHY_THIS_PILLAR

Power cost is the #1 operating expense for data center operators. A $0.01/kWh rate difference at 1 MW = $87,600/year. This pillar determines long-term operator economics before a lease is signed.

SS069_SCORE

34 / 35

ANALYTICAL_UNITS (6)

Carrier count and route diversity

Latency to nearest IXP

Dark fiber availability and pricing

SLA benchmarking across carriers

Last-mile redundancy path

Meet-me room access

DATA_SOURCES

FCC broadband data, carrier IX databases, fiber route mapping

WHY_THIS_PILLAR

Fiber diversity is non-negotiable for Tier 3 data centers. Single-carrier sites are disqualified regardless of other scores. This pillar validates carrier SLAs before capital is committed.

SS069_SCORE

28 / 30

ANALYTICAL_UNITS (7)

Floor load PSF (concrete slab rating)

Clear ceiling height

Column spacing and bay dimensions

Existing electrical capacity (amps/phase)

Cooling distribution infrastructure

Life safety systems compliance

Environmental history and clearances

DATA_SOURCES

Structural engineering reports, local permit records, environmental phase 1

WHY_THIS_PILLAR

Converting an industrial building to data center use requires specific structural thresholds. Floor load below 200 PSF disqualifies colocation tenants. This pillar determines conversion feasibility before engineering spend.

SS069_SCORE

38 / 40

ANALYTICAL_UNITS (6)

Zoning designation (M-2/M-1 preferred)

Permit timeline estimate

Environmental clearance status

Tax abatement and incentive stack

20-year regulatory stability score

Easement and title clear status

DATA_SOURCES

County zoning records, state incentive databases, environmental agency filings

WHY_THIS_PILLAR

Zoning conflicts discovered post-LOI have killed projects at $500K+ sunk cost. This pillar is verified pre-LOI. M-2 Heavy Industrial is the highest-confidence designation for data center conversion.

SS069_SCORE

24 / 25

ANALYTICAL_UNITS (7)

Acquisition cost vs. appraised value

NOI and DSCR modeling

Cap rate benchmark comparison

TCO modeling over 10-year horizon

Lease sensitivity analysis

Exit scenario modeling (sale/refi/hold)

IRR across three scenarios (base/upside/stress)

DATA_SOURCES

MAI-certified appraisal, CPA-reviewed financials, institutional lender verification

WHY_THIS_PILLAR

Sites that look physically qualified frequently fail on financial structure. The financial pillar is run simultaneously with physical scoring to avoid committing engineering time to unworkable deals.

SS069_SCORE

34 / 35

ANALYTICAL_UNITS (7)

FEMA flood zone classification

USGS seismic zone rating

Workforce availability within 30 miles

Supply chain access index

Insurance adequacy and coverage

HVAC climate risk score

Corridor competition density

DATA_SOURCES

FEMA flood maps, USGS seismic database, BLS workforce data, climate risk models

WHY_THIS_PILLAR

Risk factors that surface post-acquisition cannot be priced out. The risk pillar eliminates sites with systemic exposure before any due diligence spend. SS069 scores in FEMA Flood Zone X (minimal flood hazard).

SS069_SCORE

33 / 35

SS069_LIVE_DEMO · WATCH_THE_METHODOLOGY_SCORE_A_REAL_PROPERTY

1509 Rapids Drive, Racine, WI — scored live.

This is the same asset acquired for $3.1M in February 2023 and independently appraised at $12.0M in January 2025. Every score below is verified. The methodology produced the outcome.

Power Infrastructure

0 / 35

Fiber & Connectivity

0 / 30

Building Quality

0 / 40

Regulatory & Zoning

0 / 25

Financial Profile

0 / 35

Risk Architecture

0 / 35

MOAT_SCORE · SS069

0

/ 100

OUTCOME_VERIFIED

$3.1M acquisition → $12.0M MAI appraisal
24.5% base IRR · 36 profitable months

RANK: #1 OF 1,676 SCREENED · 99TH PERCENTILE

SCORE_DISTRIBUTION · SS069_VS_1676_SCREENED

Where 95 sits in a field of 1,676.

Most properties screened score between 30 and 60. Properties above 85 are rare. Properties above 90 are rarer still. SS069 scored 95.

0-105010-2012020-3028030-4038040-5035050-6025060-7015070-807080-9016SS0699590-10010PROPERTIES

All screened (1,676)

SS069 (score: 95)

x-axis = MOAT score bucket  ·  y-axis = properties screened in bucket

PRELIMINARY_TRIAGE · RUN_YOUR_PROPERTY_NOW

Does your property qualify? Find out in 90 seconds.

Seven questions. Deterministic scoring. The same criteria applied to all 1,676 properties. No email required. No form submission. Your preliminary MOAT tier appears instantly.

PRELIMINARY_MOAT_TRIAGE · 7 QUESTIONS · 90 SECONDS

Answer 7 questions about your property. Receive a preliminary MOAT tier in under 90 seconds. No account. No email required. Deterministic scoring based on the same criteria applied to all 1,676 properties.

INTELLIGENCE_PRODUCTS · FIVE_NAMED_DELIVERABLES

Each engagement produces a named intelligence product.

The names are drawn from ancient roots — Hebrew and Greek — because the intent behind each is not a deliverable. It is a posture.

CHAKAR

Chakar

Hebrew · “To explore / examine deeply

Full 441-unit forensic site analysis. The complete engagement.

CHORA

Chora

Greek · “Space / The receptacle of being

Metro-level spatial intelligence and corridor mapping.

CETEO

Ceteo

Greek · “To seek with intent to find

Continuous site identification pipeline. Active market hunting.

CEREN

Ceren

Hebrew · “Ray of power / strength

Utility and electrical infrastructure analysis only.

CERYX

Ceryx

Greek · “The Herald / Data Messenger

Investor-grade reporting and market intelligence packaging.

FULL_ASSESSMENT · 441_UNIT_MOAT · PRE-LOI_DELIVERY

Request a full site assessment before you commit capital.

The full 441-unit MOAT assessment is delivered pre-LOI. Before legal fees. Before engineering. Before capital is at risk.

Request Site AssessmentView Live Example

Stewardship over speculation. People over profits. Christ at the center.

The 441-unit MOAT framework is a proprietary analytical system developed by B2B Systems LLC. Scores are based on verified data inputs as of the assessment date and do not guarantee future performance or investment returns. The SS069 MOAT score of 95/100 reflects conditions as of the assessment date. The MAI-certified appraisal of $12.0M was conducted by Newmark in January 2025. All financial projections are estimates and not guarantees. Past performance does not indicate future results. This page does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation to purchase any security.

© 2026 The Center Capital Collective. All rights reserved. Advisory services by B2B Systems LLC.